this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
63 points (100.0% liked)

History

4361 readers
3 users here now

Welcome to History!

This community is dedicated to sharing and discussing fascinating historical facts from all periods and regions.

Rules:

FOLLOW THE CODE OF CONDUCT

NOTE WELL: Personal attacks and insults will not be tolerated. Stick to talking about the historical topic at hand in your comments. Insults and personal attacks will get you an immediate ban for a period of time determined by the moderator who bans you.

  1. Post about history. Ask a question about the past, share a link to an article about something historical, or talk about something related to history that interests you. Please encourage discussion whenever possible.

  2. No memes. No ads. No promos. No spam.

  3. No porn.

  4. We like facts and reliable sources here. Don't spread misinformation or try to change the historical record.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Great Fire of London in 1666, ignited by a small flame in a bakery on Pudding Lane, swiftly escalated into a devastating inferno that ravaged the city. Consuming over 13,000 houses and 87 churches, the fire's destructive path seemed unstoppable.

Yet, amidst the chaos, the remarkable fact remains that only six recorded deaths occurred, a testament to the city's successful evacuation and the absence of high casualty figures in such a catastrophic event. This historic fire prompted significant urban planning changes and the rebuilding of London, ultimately shaping the city's architectural landscape for centuries to come.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Fire_of_London

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Ohh, great fun, I once read up on that fire while writing a small text on fire safety in cities of the Early Modern Period. The 1666 fire was certainly unprecedented in size looking at the last few hundred years before it, but smaller fires were rather common, leading to a generally well prepared population. I'd wager that this led to the low death count, and the premature dismissal of the fire to the tune of "A woman could piss it out".

In the end, however, the fire was stopped by demolishing the wooden houses next to the active fire, preventing further spread to even more parts of the city. Hooks for breaking down wooden walls were common by then, explosives were used for that as well. I recommend this paper for deeper reading on the fire itself.

Furthermore, by ~1700, there are multiple detailled fire policies of cities written down, giving great insight into the particularities of fire fighting. In the lawbook of the city I looked at for my paper, every house was forced to stash one bucket of water, and help out with that bucket if a house in their street was on fire. Things like distribution of water sprayers in the case of emergency to the population was listed, as were monetary rewards to the first people extinguishing the fire. This is the fire policy which I looked at, it's in german, but well worth a read if you are able to.

Edit: Before I forget, here's a paper regarding the rebuilding of London after 1666. There were four plans after only a few days of the fire happening!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Fascinating stuff. Thank you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It was informative and engaging. Thank you for sharing it!