this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
272 points (96.9% liked)

Games

16837 readers
1002 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO
272
Seasoned RPG devs from Obsidian and Bioware blame the temporary death of the isometric CRPG on 'vibes-based forecasting' from retailers (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/games
89 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

"I can't stress enough how often I'd hear a retail rep declare a genre/style/look was dead with zero supporting data."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 10 months ago (5 children)

And they are probably correct.

If this game wasn't called bg 3 it wouldn't be selling like it it.

Rouge trader hit #2 for a day or two and went away. It'll be a mid success and make some money from the 40k name. But other crogs just don't sell as much and are risky.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Rouge trader hit #2 for a day or two and went away

Probably because there's only so much makeup you can sell before the novelty wears off.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Poor business choice, you’ll always be in the red

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Counter: If they'd called in Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition The Videogame it would have sold just as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I don't know, I think the BG branding on top of it did help with the hype because of BG2's reputation and existing fanbase. The D&D aspect is definitely a bigger deal though.

Ultimately I think it sold well because it's a really good game that was easy to turn into fun memes and clips. Plus early access meant there were a ton of people who already played it which helped the hype even more.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't agree. Plenty of DND forgotten realms games failed after bg2.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Long time between BG2's release and the phenomenon that is Fifth Edition DnD.

The popularity and widespread appeal of dungeons and dragons in recent years can't be overstated

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It would probably only have sold as much as D:OS 3. Which wouldn't have been a bad sale either, just not as much as BG3.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Agreed, but Bg was FAR more complex and involved. The high quality acting is expensive as fuck which makes it a higher risk.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I think you are overestimating the brand recognition of a game series from the 2000s.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can we please Not act like the name alone is making this game such a succes

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

No. It's a good game that's 100% helped along because of the name.