this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
67 points (93.5% liked)
Asklemmy
44165 readers
1647 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
And just to express a sort of wishlist for future lemmy development ... where a developer might be interested in taking this specific idea on ... there's probably some low hanging fruit around making lemmy more a dedicated blogging platform.
Take the moderator-only community mechanism mentioned above and make this a more straight forward process. Probably work on the moderation tooling a bit to make it easier to control any dumpster fire comments situations. Maybe work on tagging (which is already something being worked on I think). Then there's theming, where people might want their personal community to appear a certain customised way.
And then, and this would be a big one maybe, add the ability to control who is able to subscribe (where private communties already seem to be on the roadmap for lemmy). Once you can control that, then integrating some third party subscriptions service would allow an author to try to collect subscriptions for their content ... and you have a federated substack substitute where the author could use their account/instance to also browser and comment on the wider fediverse too.
This seems tricky to enforce on a per-user basis since content federated to another instance for one user could easily be shared with another user on that instance without the original instance ever knowing about that.
It definitely does get tricky. In general, guarantees about control over the network get tricky, and it seems like a limitation of the fediverse for this sort of stuff.
Imposing limitations can maybe go far though. Keeping such users on a single instance or on a single platform could be helpful? I donβt knitter this space unfortunately. Maybe some cryptography would be necessary?