this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
31 points (84.4% liked)
Asklemmy
43992 readers
853 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I use rechargeable AAs and AAAs in all of my remotes, controllers, mice, etc, and the kids’ toys are so chaotic that I wouldn’t put anything in them I wasn’t willing to lose, so the batteriser has literally no value to me. I’m sure I’m not the only one.
And I've heard rechargeable batteries don't even leak, that would be another plus.
Why don’t we have lithium ion AA batteries yet? I’ve seen lithium iron phosphate.
I think it has the wrong voltage. 4.2V instead of 1.5V.
I know nothing, but I am surprised the voltage issue cannot be efficiently fixed with a circuit.
@ripe_[email protected] posted a link to such a product, it's possible. The question is: is it viable...
The chemicals in NiMH rechargeable batteries aren't that rare/expensive and it works.
Adding a circuit needs additional space in that small form-factor that takes away from the space the actual battery could occupy. And the circuit needs power itself. And the chips costs additional money, and it's more complicated to manufacture which costs yet more money. I can only imagine you end up with a product that's about on the same level with the regular batteries, just more expensive.
And I'm not sure about the market for AA batteries. Nowadays lots of products have batteries soldered inside of them. And the next step in tech is probably not a backwards-compatible AA battery, but something like the 18650, which is already widely adopted. And they come in the size of AA batteries as well, called: 14500 Lithium Batteries.
Random duckduckgo search brought me to this product. Maybe they are not comercially viable yet?
There are, but to use them as a replacement for NiMH/Alkaline cells, they need voltage conversion and typically have a built in charging circuit so you can charge then via USB-C for example. Theyre expensive, have a similar capacity compared to NiMH and can't be charged in a regular battery charger.
On an other note, there are 1.5V lithium batteries (non-rechargable). They supposedly have a higher capacity and last longer.
And then there are 14500 Li-Ion cells that are about the size of an AA cell but run at 3.6V.
Not leaking would be huge. I forgot about that. Lithium are great for not leaking, but crazy expensive.