this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
377 points (97.5% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4681 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 54 points 8 months ago (2 children)

But that district court judge, Sarah Wallace, ultimately ruled that Trump could remain on the ballot because she said it was not clear that the drafters or ratifiers of the 14th Amendment intended to cover the presidency in the insurrection clause.

fuck outta here with this bullshit

[–] [email protected] 33 points 8 months ago (3 children)

If you participate in insurrection, you are not allowed to hold any office in the United States… except the highest apparently.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago

Clearly what they intended. /s

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It was such a ridiculous ruling. We even have the literal discussions from congress when it passed. Someone asked what about president, and another senator replied hey look we said all offices, how much more clear could it be.

From the congressional record at that time:

"Why did you omit to exclude them?" asked Maryland Democratic Sen. Reverdy Johnson. [in reference to president and vice president]

Maine's Lot Morrill jumped in to clarify.

"Let me call the Senator's attention to the words 'or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States,'" Morrill said, ending the discussion on that point.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/what-the-framers-said-about-the-14th-amendments-disqualification-clause-analysis/ar-AA1mduxW

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Actually, you totally can. It's just if you've sworn an oath to defend the Constitution and then used the benefits of the position that required that commitment to try to overthrow the government...Then you are not allowed. Any of those J6 morons that hadn't sworn such an oath are still allowed to hold office.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago

Are you just learning this piece of old news? Really?

This is why Trump won. Complacency.