this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
368 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

71313 readers
3735 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/8121669

Taggart (@mttaggart) writes:

Japan determines copyright doesn't apply to LLM/ML training data.

On a global scale, Japan’s move adds a twist to the regulation debate. Current discussions have focused on a “rogue nation” scenario where a less developed country might disregard a global framework to gain an advantage. But with Japan, we see a different dynamic. The world’s third-largest economy is saying it won’t hinder AI research and development. Plus, it’s prepared to leverage this new technology to compete directly with the West.

I am going to live in the sea.

www.biia.com/japan-goes-all-in-copyright-doesnt-apply-to-ai-training/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mindbleach 6 points 1 year ago

Pouring the entire library into a sieve to get a gigabyte of linear algebra is pretty goddamn transformative. I do not understand why people think this is something they should stop, even if they mistakenly think it can be stopped.

Do you really want an internet full of synthetic catgirls? Because this is how you get an internet full of synthetic catgirls.

That's this guy's argument against AI. He thinks that's a threat.

This fight is over. It's been barely a year, and random people are already advancing the state of the art using mundane consumer hardware. You're not about to claw back their plain-text corpuseses and suspiciously thematic image folders. Destroy every existing model and new ones will emerge in a matter of days.

Onerous legal obstacles will only restrict this to exactly the rich bastards you don't want exploiting it. The sort of people who always see labor-saving technology as a way to fuck labor harder.