this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
326 points (98.5% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4553 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal appeals court on Tuesday ruled that Texas hospitals and doctors are not obligated to perform abortions under a longstanding national emergency-care law, dealing a blow to the White House's strategy to ensure access to the procedure after the Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to abortion in 2022.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 127 points 8 months ago (2 children)

And they claim that they "don't hate women they just love babies! <3 <3"

I am disgusted, but not surprised.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 8 months ago (2 children)

They just hate their political opposition.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They love everything their media tells them to.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I wonder what it would cost to secretly buy up faux news and maybe OAN and the start pushing “subversive” material. (The truth is subversive, yes?)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It would probably be easier to just make a new one. Have a few articles slamming dems, but then secretly push left wing politics in a “conservative” voice.

“Biden doesn’t have to balls to pass the Freedom Health Care Act” (which will secretly be socialized health care).

They’re so dumb they’ll believe anything of it comes from an obese red faced man yelling. Just slip “and our guns?!!!” In every so often.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I would disagree but when Fox was whining about what AOC believed in and put it on a bulleted list it was as much an eye opener as you can get into the thinking of a conservative. Specifically that they can say "caring for seniors" is a bad thing with a straight face knowing nobody would question them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

BUT MUH GUNZZZ

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

hah. exactly. Though, honestly... OAN and Faux news has name recognition. it's hard to take the views from them, or to build up such a network. Remember. Fox was purposes built to sell propaganda since '96(?). we don't have that kind of time

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Well, you’re right that we don’t have that kind of time. The effort would have to be very organized, and it would cost a lot of money. I doubt that kind of funding could be raised knowing it was a farce without the truth getting out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They're not for sale. They're ideological organizations. At best you'd need a decades long con to even float the idea.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

everybody has a price. The more... noble... people, that price might not be cash. but every one has a price.

Murdochs? yeah, they'll sell if it's high enough. They'll even keep it quiet if it's high enough.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I doubt that with these people. When you have the kinds of money these people do it's not about more money but more power. Quite literally controlling how a not insignificant portion of the "western world" views the world is absolutely invaluable.

[–] BakedGoods 1 points 8 months ago

It's not even politics. It's religion. Literal mental illness.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Love dying babies, dead moms****

Because moms aren't women, they are moms!!!/s