this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
229 points (98.3% liked)
unions
1774 readers
50 users here now
a community focused on union news, info, discussion, etc
Friends:
- https://lemmy.ml/c/labor
- https://sh.itjust.works/c/unions
- https://lemmy.ml/c/coops
- https://lemmy.ml/c/antitrust
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As I read only two days ago on Lemmy:
America pays US$1.8T/yr for the government (non-user-fee) part of healthcare delivery costs, and users are still required to pay HUGE sums and/or force their insurers to pay for a sizeable portion.
6 EU nations with 335M people altogether pay US$1.2T/yr (or 1/3 less) and their people don't pay a cent for service.
So already the USGov is paying 50% more than it needs to pay if it wanted to offer a similarly free-for-the-patient kind of healthcare as is provided by 8 of the top 10 happiest nations. It's just such a broken system that merely locking it down to single-payer would save half a trillion US dollars a year and ensure equal healthcare access for all once the reorg was complete. And Obama knew.
Obama's only mistake was thinking he'd be allowed to start that process.
I never thought of it this way, but you're right.
Wow, must be working!