this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2023
630 points (97.6% liked)

linuxmemes

20892 readers
388 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 85 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Technically this post is illegal until tomorrow, but I dig that.

[โ€“] 0x4E4F 107 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's tomorrow in some places ๐Ÿ˜‚.

[โ€“] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but the IP was held by an American Company.

Happy New Year.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Would using a VPN make posting it from NZ illegal right after midnight if the IP is logged from a country not past midnight?

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I love that we're having a whole hypothetical discussion about this. I think the time in the timezone where the rights were held probably took priority over the time for the poster of the image at the time of upload. Regardless of what timezone you post from, it would have been posted before midnight for Disney and the relevant courts.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

That sounds to me like it's probably correct. ๐Ÿ‘

[โ€“] 0x4E4F 1 points 9 months ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

They used to be

[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Not really. I think it's considered free speech if it's sarcastic or a parody.

[โ€“] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Free speech doesn't apply to Intellectual Property at all, or rather you're free to say whatever you want but you can still be sued for anything that you say.

What you're thinking of is "Fair Use".

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Thanks for the clarification.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

" If Disney sues, we'll claim fair use...

Ho hi! "

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

"hi ho, hi ho, it's off to court we go..."

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

And fair use exists to protect free speech.

[โ€“] merc 5 points 9 months ago

Yes, the infamous "sarcastic" exception to copyright.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's still illegal. This version of Mickey Mouse is still covered under trademark law.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What do you mean? What part of this infringes on copyright?

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Trademark. Not copyright. And the part that is covered is Mickey.

This could also be covered under copyright, since the only Mickey that went into public domain is the one from Steamboat Willie, not this one. I'm not a lawyer, though.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

This is the one from steamboat willy though

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago

As of 2024, Micky is now public domain, at least the variant from Steamboat Willie.