this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
303 points (85.6% liked)

Technology

59719 readers
2742 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Original toot in Spanish says: "OK, so I need some alternatives to Google Maps, because I just decided seconds ago to stop using it after I got proposed a trip with a completely unnecessary detour which adds two extra minutes just because it pass by a gas station that sponsors this trip."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merc 177 points 11 months ago (12 children)

The picture suggests that there was an ad that suggested a stop at the sponsored gas station, if the user clicked on the suggestion / ad, then the route would be modified.

IMO that's massively different than the detour being added by default. If they actually did / were doing that, it would be a huge scandal, but I don't think that's what's happening here. Instead, it's just an intrusive, annoying ad.

[–] elfio 8 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Might be. It's indeed hard to tell by the picture, but the user seems to knows the place so I don't know. What seems about right is the title is misleading so I'm going to change it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Please change "added a sponsored detour" to "proposed a sponsored detour" and it won't be as misleading anymore

[–] elfio 1 points 11 months ago

Thanks for the proposal!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)