this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
645 points (97.8% liked)

Greentext

3770 readers
1728 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 68 points 7 months ago (14 children)

When did it change from .jpg to .webp?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago (10 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Webp is just a more data efficient format, lots of sites are switching to it because it can greatly decrease bandwidth and storage costs.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 7 months ago

I don't think anyone here was unfamiliar with what a .webp was besides maybe @[email protected]. OP was just pointing out it's weird to see a greentext using anything besides .jpg

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The only problem is that basically no software supports it, so if you're saving pictures for a slideshow or something, webp is impossible to use.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, what is up with that?

Most photo software supports so many formats, and it is not like webp is a brand new one. It is also widely used on the internet by this point.

Why does it take so long to get support on any of them without installing a separate plugin?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

WebP was shoehorned in by Google through Chrome. Other browsers felt pressured to support it as to not be left behind. Other software didn't feel as pressured and is still resisting adding support to this day. Same thing with WebM.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)