this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
24 points (90.0% liked)

Technology

68673 readers
3411 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This has been my biggest concern. Getting it wrong will simply drive certain types of research underground or overseas, where they will still happen, merely less controlled.

It's an issue that needs to be approached very carefully. I don't find myself advocating for government beaurocracy very often, but AI deserves its own subcommittees in the House and Senate, so a handful of politicians can at least try to take the time to become specifically educated on the topic. Then they can be douchebags about it, but at least they won't be able to claim ignorance.

[–] voidhearts@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I feel that in order for that to happen, we really need younger representatives who have an understanding of how AI works and its current/potential impacts. I really don’t see any of the older politicians having anywhere close to the understanding or willingness to learn about this kind of technology in a way that would lead to productive discourse and regulation.