this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
494 points (97.0% liked)

Greentext

4623 readers
1854 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
494
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Early_To_Risa to c/greentext
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, traditionally, someone has to like you before they decide they want to fuck you

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Traditional was so, so much worse than that

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's generally how it's been done in America for hundreds of years. I think peasants in Europe did it like that even further back too. So how long until it can be considered "tradition"?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't read much in the way of history, do you?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Rich families married for power, peasants married for love. That's pretty much how it's always been. Lmao do you think people who worked on a lords farm was also worrying about who their daughter could marry to get a leg up? That's ridiculous

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

From the University of Nottingham:

People from land-owning families did not normally marry for love. Instead, most such marriages were arranged by their parents or guardians.

Arranged marriages remain an important part of the culture of many societies in the world today, for the same implicit reasons that probably motivated medieval English people: for the creation of stable family units based on respect and duty, in which love can grow; and to protect and increase the family’s wealth and status by association with another family of equal or higher repute.

Peasant women who did not own any land were not exempt from some kind of control over their marriage, as many manorial lords demanded payment of a sum of money called a ‘merchet’

https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/manuscriptsandspecialcollections/learning/medievalwomen/theme5/marriagearrangements.aspx

There are plenty of examples, both rich and poor, if you scroll down.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you think peasants married for just love and not because their father promised them to the son of a farmer they have dealings with, or to a businessman who can provide well for her, or to elevate the family standing in some other way, I have bad news.

Even to this day, after all the strides for equality of the sexes is the material wealth of a man a substantial factor in choosing a partner for most women, even if they are plenty able to provide for themselves.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I didn't say "just for love" but it did happen. None of this information provided contradicts my point that traditionally people have sex with people they like. That has been the case for a while now, back to my original question, how long until you would consider it tradition? 100 years seems enough to me

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I agree with you, as stated above, but I have to mention that my wonderful wife more or less picked (for reasons I never understood) me up from homelessness and debt and has cared for me for the past 15 years. I guess these days I'm almost domesticated, even.