this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
141 points (98.0% liked)

Bicycles

3026 readers
64 users here now

Welcome to [email protected]

A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you're a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!


Community Rules


Other cycling-related communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The prosecution pushed for a $1,000 fine and a complete driving ban, while the defense argued for a higher fine ranging from $1,500 to $1,800 without any prohibitions. Along with the $1,150 fine the judge restricted his driving to work duties and picking up his kids.

Just imagine if your kid was killed by a truck driver, and the courts were battling over a few extra hundred dollars for the fine. No jail, and a very loose "ban" on driving for the person who killed your kid.

I just don't know why a cyclist (or pedestrian's) life means nothing in the eyes of the law.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He's no longer a truck driver, so that's irrelevant. He's allowed to use his vehicle for work, as this was not part of his driving restrictions.

There's really not much the courts can do to make up for the loss to the family, but an $1100 fine is offensive.

Consider this: the fine for littering in B.C can be up to $2000 with up to six months in jail. Literally, more than negligently killing someone with your truck. ๐Ÿง‘โ€โš–๏ธ

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

Ah, I had misunderstood, and yeah you're right that with that context it's very also on the wrist