this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
18 points (100.0% liked)
Science
13263 readers
30 users here now
Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
to me that just makes no sense - I mean there's probably some kind of math-evaluation that said so, but... uh...
slower compared to what? It's not like you can take a stopwatch and look how long a second feels.
Time "now" isn't fixed either - move closer to a black hole or just move faster and your time becomes slower - COMPARED TO THE REMAINING UNIVERSE.
But you'll only notice when you return and compare clocks. Back then, when everything was faster, there wasn't something to compare to? So nothing was faster?
From the article:
“If you were there, in this infant universe, one second would seem like one second – but from our position, more than 12 billion years into the future, that early time appears to drag.”
They are comparing to time now. If you assume a quasar expels stuff at the same rate through all time, then when you look far back in time you should see pulses coming from the distant stars at the same rate as now. Yes, that light took billions of years to get here but the pulsing rate should be the same.
They found that it isn't, it's five times slower, which implies that time then must be five times slower than now.
expired