Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
The really funny part is that you think you're tricking anyone.
You know you're lying, but you do it anyway.
Like I said, even Throwaway admitted it was a White Nationalist publication, although he upvoted your White Nationalist apologetics. Wonder what that's about?
I wouldn't waste too much time with this particular poster as they like to make insane assertions and run away when their narrative starts to crumble only to post another and try again.
Sure. What’s insane with my statement? Let’s hear it.
You can start with answering this comment from five hours ago on this thread that you've ignored so far:
"
Or this from two day ago that you never responded to, just moved on to other posts.
"The names you listed are disgraced, in jail or dead but the big name conservatives don’t seem to suffer any consequences from their peers.
I’m also not claiming that any group of people have universal characteristics and I’m interested in hearing why you think they do."
I say what I need to say and move it. If the argument from the opposing person is senseless or weak, I move on.
I don’t know of conservatives that do as claimed. So how can I respond to something so generic? So I don’t.
And your comment has nothing to do with the topic. So I ignored it.
Maybe the issue is people ask off topic or silly things trying to “win” and that’s why I don’t respond. You didn’t catch my interest.
Thanks for proving my exact point.
What that you brought up something off topic and I decided to ignore it? If you don’t state something interesting or relevant, you can’t expect people to respond to you. Nobody owes you a response to irreverent statements.
Which comment was off-topic?
The whole citation talking about conservatives. The topic was democrats and their strong association to fascism. It’s a well known tie. You didn’t dispute the book or the book review. You tried to talk about something else that was off topic and I ignored it.
If you want to go off topic, most people will ignore it.
This citation I got from the article you posted was off topic?
And? What does that have to do with democrats being fascist ?
I'm not exactly sure, you are the one who shared it with me.
Was i reading the wrong part of the article that you sent to me?
Did I read it wrong?
Most the article is a review of the book and how it accurately shows the democrats are fascists.
The person then says conservatives are guilty for supporting those programs. So it’s looping back to democrats are fascists since those are primarily democrat programs.
I wouldn’t call social security fascism but it’s a wealth transfer that is a waste of money.
That's not what the author of the article you shared with me thinks.
I thought this conversation was off topic and wasn't worth your time.
Overall, The Big Lie is rich in historical data and clearly demonstrates that Fascism and Nazism belong on the political left
Now the reviewer does argue that the Nazis were inspired by the Democrats and not the other way around.
If I believe your statement that 'Democrats are Nazis' and add in that statement from the article you shared with me I end up with 'conservatives are as much as nazis as Democrats - perhaps more so'.
Do you feel that's accurate?
For supporting democrat policies. I would say the republicans enable them. The republicans have went from having ideas to trying to shit of anything the democrats do.
Sorry I don't fully understand you.
Do you feel that statement is accurate or not?
No, and I explained why
I don't exactly understand how you explained why you don't feel the statement ‘conservatives are as much nazis as Democrats - perhaps more so' is not accurate.
You said they support democratic policies that you feel are Nazi policies.
You said that the conservatives/republicans enable the Dems being Nazis.
How can they do both of those yet not be guilty of being Nazis themselves?
It seems you agree Democrats are Nazis. Republicans just enable their bad behavior. Maybe both sides are fascist. We did use a lot of Nazis after WW2 to do things in our government.
I'm trying to have a conversation with you and understand how you think.
When have I ever said that I think either side are Nazis or fascists?
I really don't appreciate you putting your words in my mouth and I'd like to ask you to not do that again.
Rule 1, be excellent to each other, civility, namecalling, sealioning, being an asshole in general.
Due to your general history of being an ass, and the fact you already got warned Zombie, I'm handing out a ban.
On a somewhat related note, I vote on nearly everything in this community. It helps me keep track of what I looked at.
And I'm making a list of who I already warned, so I don't have through 19 pages of my own comment history to find where I warned you.