this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
149 points (92.6% liked)

Videos

14346 readers
106 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to [email protected] instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both [email protected] and [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

That, and the internal combustion engine will never replace horses.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

Well, it didn't. If cars replaced horses why are there still horses? Checkmate atheists.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So what you're saying is that the only thing between you and imaginary devices that break physics is just your willpower?

Because that's not how the world (read: the entire universe) works. You can want all you want but physics is physics, you obey those laws like it or not.

Going "but Elon Musk" isn't helping either, it only makes it worse as a known incompetent liar will make lots of ridiculous claims that never become reality

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Your comment is great! I've never seen such a calamity of fallacies. Well done. My only point was that doubting the ability of people to solve problems with technological bottlenecks has not gone well by pointing out a famous example of that, but you invented a whole world of misinterpretation that doesn't seem to apply to my point at all.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I hate how the internet made people vaguely aware of the concept of logical fallacies which makes them take said concept and run with it without understand how it works.

I'm telling you that you CAN'T break physics and that there are a lot of "innovations" out there that haven't done anything and never will be anything because their very premise breaks physics and you start ranting about fallacies. I guess you don't know how to say "I don't know about this subject"?

Willpower is great, but there are things that either simply aren't possible, or literally plain stupid on an engineering level (hello Hyperloop!) If you find that fact a fallacy then I have a bridge to sell you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah that's right, the issue isn't you making broad assumptions about a one-line comment and going off on some rant about Elon Musk and other imaginary arguments you read into my - again - one-line comment that made a simple and specific point. No no, the issue is that people on the internet don't understand how fallacies work. I have to ask, for you to have reached that opinion, how many times have people called your arguments fallacious, and as a follow up, are you sure you aren't the one that can't properly identify fallacies, rather than... everyone else?