this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

33 readers
1 users here now

A place for quality hardware news, reviews, and intelligent discussion.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It is kinda more efficient tho.
Power consumption per clock doesn't scale linearly.
Splitting a task into two parts and running it on two cores at 2 GHz will consume less power and generate less heat than running it on a single core at 4 GHz.
Its significantly harder to do that programming wise, but performance wise it has its benefits.
It also frees up the main high performance core to focus on more important tasks.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

That's assuming you can split it efficiently without any overhead. It's not just a problem to be "solved" that devs don't bother with, a lot of tasks scale poorly across threads even if you successfully multi thread them