Announcements

23329 readers

1 users here now

Official announcements from the Lemmy project. Subscribe to this community or add it to your RSS reader in order to be notified about new releases and important updates.

You can also find major news on join-lemmy.org

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

463

Lemmy.ml v0.19 upgrade issues and downtime. (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

188 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In anticipation of Lemmy's upcoming 0.19 release, and to work out any final issues, we're going to deploy a test release on lemmy.ml within the next few days.

We're doing this testing on lemmy.ml only, so that we can encounter any issues before the release, and to make sure the upgrade process is smooth for other production servers.

Some of the following will happen during the process:

Apps will likely break (only for lemmy.ml)
Lemmy.ml may experience some downtime for the upgrade to complete (ideally no more than an hour).
If anything goes wrong, we may have to restore from a database backup, meaning content made in between backups may be lost.

If all goes well, we'll have an official announcement for the release after this testing period.

I apologize for the difficulties this might cause. At most this will be a week of hair-pulling, but its vital that we catch any issues before telling other servers to upgrade.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If I remember correctly it doesn't block comments from instance users, only posts which could already be archived by using apps.

A shame but better than nothing I guess.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it doesn’t block comments from instance users, only posts

Which is enough for me.

which could already be archived by using apps

And that's the thing here: You don't need any apps anymore because it is implemented serverside. I am also not a fan of apps in general (they don't fit my "workflow").

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's nice, but it could be better.