this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
-11 points (34.3% liked)

Conservative

385 readers
90 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (9 children)

It would seem to imply that wouldn't it, but it doesn't actually when you think about it. After all, the holocaust would still have been a genocide EVEN IF 6 million Jewish people were also born during world war 2. I'm glad I could help you through this misunderstanding!

So once again, the birth rate is not at issue, has no bearing, and in fact has nothing to do with the definition of Genocide. It's not the birth rate, thats not a thing, that has never been a thing, it does not and never has been a part of the definition of genocide.

It has nothing, nothing, nothing, to do with the birth rate. I hope I have stated that clearly and politely :D

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (8 children)

You're confused about what a genocide is. Yes, birth rate is defined in the phrase. Since the destruction of the group is the end goal, if they're growing, then you are not doing a great job a genocide.

SInce Israel does not have the goal of destroying the Palestinians, it isn't genocide. It isn't by definition, no matter how much you want to pretend it is. ]

It is nothing more than self-defense from the the attack from the Palestinians. If they stopped attacking Israel, then Israel wouldn't attack them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Hey good news wintermute! The UN are currently calling on the international community to declare the events in Palestine as a Genocide! Here is a link:

https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/11/gaza-un-experts-call-international-community-prevent-genocide-against

Also, I checked the wikipedia article for the phrase "Birth Rate" and it does not come up. In fact the only mention of birth is that an addition definition for genocide is the prevention of births, however it is not a necessary action to meet the definition of the word Genocide.

Genocide can take many forms, and CANNOT, IN ANY WAY, AT ALL, EVER, be counteracted by the rate of new births. That is not a thing and has never been a thing. Can you please provide me any literature that claims that the increase in births has any bearing on whether an action can be viewed as a Genocide?

[–] No1RivenFucker -1 points 11 months ago

Wow, the UN. Call me when someone worth a damn says something

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)