AI Generated Images

7030 readers

138 users here now

Community for AI image generation. Any models are allowed. Creativity is valuable! It is recommended to post the model used for reference, but not a rule.

No explicit violence, gore, or nudity.

This is not a NSFW community although exceptions are sometimes made. Any NSFW posts must be marked as NSFW and may be removed at any moderator's discretion. Any suggestive imagery may be removed at any time.

Refer to https://lemmynsfw.com/ for any NSFW imagery.

No misconduct: Harassment, Abuse or assault, Bullying, Illegal activity, Discrimination, Racism, Trolling, Bigotry.

AI Generated Videos are allowed under the same rules. Photosensitivity warning required for any flashing videos.

To embed images type:

“![](put image url in here)”

Follow all sh.itjust.works rules.

Related communities:

[email protected]
Useful general AI discussion
[email protected]
Photo-realistic AI images
[email protected] Stable Diffusion Art
[email protected] Stable Diffusion Anime Art
[email protected] AI art generated through bots
[email protected]
NSFW weird and surreal images
[email protected]
NSFW AI generated porn

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[Stable Diffusion] A selfie in nature (i.imgur.com)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/imageai

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's cool how quickly the brain can pick out the subtle issues, despite how near perfect the image is

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

True, but only when you expect it. I've seen real pictures with weird lighting before and if I didn't know they were real, I would've thought of Photoshop. With some experience you know what to look for, but there have already been plenty of studies showing that AI persons can not properly be distinguished from real people in pictures.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Definitely true

I wonder if we're going to end up with a new field of forensic medicine determining if media is real based on subtle anatomy/biomechanics details. Even if the person is real, a particular photo or video might not be

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Also at what point is an image altered? Every camera has an ISP that improves image quality, so that shouldn't be counted as an alteration, even if it can impact the image quite significantly. Then there's manual tools like photoshop, which can do things like the ISP, but also a lot more and then you got some "AI" tools that blur the lines even more. At least CNNs are just filter banks with learned kernels (to be very reductive). The cut is a bit clearer with diffusion image generation and similar tech, as that stuff is just clearly fake, but what about img-to-img diffusion?