this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
-3 points (49.3% liked)

Technology

59168 readers
2141 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
-3
OpenAI's reported 'superintelligence' breakthrough is so big it nearly destroyed the company, and ChatGPT (www.techradar.com)
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
107 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What human has lost their job to AI image creation?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't know any illustrators myself but looking at news it is already happening https://www.businessinsider.com/ai-taking-jobs-fears-artists-say-already-happening-2023-10?op=1

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That article says artists are still needed to touch up the AI art, which was my whole point about people who understand code, so I think you just proved my point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ok, if your point was that instead of 90 junior programmers and 10 senior programmers before, now the 10 senior programmers will keep their job and instead of touching up the juniors code they touch up the AIs code then yes you're right, those jobs will be kept for some more time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

My point:

Even if ChatGPT gets far in advance of the way it is now in terms of writing code, at the very least you’re still going to need people to go over the code as a redundancy.

Note I never said anything about the number of people.

Maybe you should read before responding.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Ok, I will do that next time ...