Movies

51 readers

2 users here now

**For news and discussion about movies!**

founded 1 year ago

Three-and-a-half hour Scorsese blockbuster prompts pitch for movie intermissions (9now.nine.com.au)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Critics say it's not a trend but a fad. Whatever the case, one thing's for sure: if you go to the movies this summer, chances are you're going to be there for a while.

Are films getting longer? And how long is too long?

The topic's been dominating cinema circles after Martin Scorsese's epic Killings of the Flower Moon left people glued to their seat for more than one reason. It runs three hours and 26 minutes.

But cinemas who added an intermission off their own bat copped a whack from Scorsese's people.

"And for good reason," said CJ Johnson, president of the Film Critic Circle of Australia. "You have to show it as the artist intends."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That must be one reason. I can think of plenty of 3hr+ movies I've seen in cinemas before digital conversion, though. Things like Malcolm X. A lot of it was probably 35mm so may have been a different system.

I think we were kind of late to the party. Indy cinemas were still converting to digital here in the 2000s.

I thought you were an apprentice projectionist.

[–] Peppycito 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, a lowly usher. Lol! My step dad ran the theater though. Platter size and set up would definitely vary theater. Ours was new in the late 80's so it was probably pretty state of the art for the time. I was in a chain theater projection area once and the platters were all in one room and would feed down the hall to each projector and back to the platter. We had 3 platters, one for the 7:00, one for the 9:00 and the empty one for the one showing. We'd often have to lift the movie off the platter to allow for a different one. We had these clamp things that held the roll together so it didn't fall into spaghetti and we could swap movies. Movies are surprisingly heavy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is so interesting! I love hearing about stuff like this.

I do miss the old physical films. Even the dust and scratches if a print had been circulating a while. Not sure why, it sort of feels "warmer" to me which is pretty silly.

[–] Peppycito 1 points 11 months ago

It's taking me down memory lane, thinking about it!