Intel
Rules
-
Be civil. Uncivil language, slurs, and insults will result in a ban. If you can't say something respectfully, don't say it at all.
-
No Unoriginal Sources, Referral links or Paywalled Articles.
-
All posts must be related to Intel or Intel products.
-
Give competitors' recommendations only where appropriate. If a user asks for Intel only (i.e. i5-12600k vs i5-13400?) recommendations, do not reply with non-Intel recommendations. Commenting on a build pic saying they should have gone AMD/Nvidia is also inappropriate, don't be rude. Let people enjoy things.
-
CPU Cooling problems: Just like 95C is normal for Ryzen, 100C is normal for Intel CPUs in many workloads. If you're worried about CPU temperatures, please look at reviews for the laptop or CPU cooler you're using.
view the rest of the comments
I have ZERO idea how this is perfectly legal and not something the EU/USA have gone after. Qualcomm's patents effectively make it the only company capable of building a high performance modem with good battery life.
From Apple's perspective they have to pay a competitor to use their product that is simply inferior to integrating a modem into their silicon because patents. It's very stupid.
Even on Windows laptops, we can't get x86 laptops with built in cellular connectivity standard because of these patents mainly.
The fact Apple bought out Intel's entire failed modem division and it is still struggling is insane. This shouldn't be legal.