this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

48 readers
5 users here now

A place for quality hardware news, reviews, and intelligent discussion.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (27 children)

I wonder why everyone holds AMDs display port 2.1 in such high regard. Its barely more bandwidth than hdmi 2.1 since its not the full UHBR20 80GBPS

its UHB13.5 at 54GBPS on RDNA 3 vs 48GBPS HDMI 2.1 on ADA GPUs

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (12 children)

Because HDMI is a pain in the ass and everybody who is using a PC is expecting to use DisplayPort.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Which monitor are you running dp on right now?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I have 5 PCs and 8 monitors in my home and they are all using DP except one that's really old and uses DVI. DP is the standard connector for PC monitors.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What do you think most people globally use dp or hdmi?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

On PC monitors? DP.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Everything in my home uses HDMI.

I also don't use monitors. LG CX OLED as main monitor, sometimes hook a PC up to the regular LED bedroom tv.

No interest in using displayport, HDMI is fine for the vast majority of use cases. Not sure why we need competing connectors. Frankly, not sure why we don't all just switch to USB-C long term.

There's just no reason to not standardize with USB-C for every display.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)