Intel

24 readers

1 users here now

Rules

Be civil. Uncivil language, slurs, and insults will result in a ban. If you can't say something respectfully, don't say it at all.
No Unoriginal Sources, Referral links or Paywalled Articles.
All posts must be related to Intel or Intel products.
Give competitors' recommendations only where appropriate. If a user asks for Intel only (i.e. i5-12600k vs i5-13400?) recommendations, do not reply with non-Intel recommendations. Commenting on a build pic saying they should have gone AMD/Nvidia is also inappropriate, don't be rude. Let people enjoy things.
CPU Cooling problems: Just like 95C is normal for Ryzen, 100C is normal for Intel CPUs in many workloads. If you're worried about CPU temperatures, please look at reviews for the laptop or CPU cooler you're using.

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Is anyone else getting frustrated with how Intel names their iGPU models? It's driving me nuts. (alien.top)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been curious about the some of the low-end, yet low-energy, mini PCs that have been coming out, specifically Alder Lake ones.

N95 and N100 seem pretty cool, however I have no idea what the iGPU model is. I'm aware that one of the better performing iGPUs is called Iris Xe, not to be confused with Iris Xe Max, Iris Plus, Iris Pro, which believe me, I can't tell the difference because there's no number sequence.

For the longest time, it was easy: HD 2000, HD 3000, HD 4200/4400/4600, and then I started noticing HD 515/520, then HD 6XX, UHD 6XX, and so on.

But for the life of me, can someone please give me a direction with this iGPU naming scheme?! I like to compare GPUs and CPUs, especially amongst AMD since they've clearly held the torch at being the most affordable and powerful iGPUs in the late 2010s. The Ryzen series was exactly why I left Intel and their lackluster UHD series.

I've been interested to pick up the n100 because it's so cheap, but I don't even know what the iGPU is called, and I can't compare it to any benchmarks since I don't know the model numbers...

At the end of the day, I'm close to just saying Ryzen 7000 series and getting a 660m or 680m, because I know they're powerful, and at least I can look up their model number

Is anyone else frustrated with this?!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

*laughs in confusing radeon X, HD, R5, R7, R9, RX 400/500, VEGA ##, RX5000/6000*

HD 7990 >> RX7900 XTX

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

laughs in confusing radeon X, HD, R5, R7, R9, RX 400/500, VEGA ##, RX5000/6000 HD 7990 >> RX7900 XTX

Are you going to say anything about how the Ti 4000 series is older and slower than the RTX 4000 series as well then? It's common to reuse numbers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Nah, I already did my line. You can use that one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

But they're obviously rated in a consecutive sequence of numbers. All you need to know is that the higher the sequence, the better it is from its predecessors or alternatives.

Obviously if the naming scheme changes, it's a whole new sequence, but as long as there's a chronological order, it's easy to find the best, newer, or latest.