this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
85 points (97.8% liked)

Science Memes

10531 readers
1933 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago (4 children)

The argument I've heard is "It must stop somewhere, and whatever it stops at, we'll call that god". It's not a good argument, because it then hopes that you conflate the Judeo-Christian deity with that label and make a whole bunch of assumptions.

It's often paired with woo that falls down to simply asking "Why?", such as "Nothing could possibly be simpler than my deity"

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What is this stop business? I have it on good authority that it's turtles all the way down.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

It’s just the one turtle flying through space, the Great A'Tuin

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (3 children)

So if it stops at the universe, the universe itself is called 'God'?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

To which I would ask, "Why are you using the word 'god'?"

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

Everybody asks what is god, why is god... Nobody asks how is god.

...and it's pronounced "jod" BTW.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Yeah exactly, though then you'd generally get arguments pushing you towards "But it's actually totes Jesus".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Furthermore, what does he need with a starship?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

It's also a bad argument, because the concept of things being 'created' is an entirely human one. It's us who decided that if a pile of pre-existing atoms are moved into the shape of a chair, we'll say that chair was 'created'.

Aside from this conceptual creation, nothing is ever created in the universe, as far as we know. Atoms don't ever just pop into existence out of thin air.

I have heard the argument that the universe was just as well 'created' in the conceptual sense, so everything existed beforehand, it was just moved into a shape that we recognize as 'universe' today.
But that would still mean there's no argument for a creator and of course, this is simply not what most people mean when they talk about the creation of the universe.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

If I remember correctly from my hazy years of school philosophy classes, it was Thomas Aquinas who suggested it. Who was a friar, so that's why the assumption of the religion.

Also, I understood the core idea being that God isn't what IS the beginning, but that the point where human mind can't comprehend beyond is God. Which, back then, and even now, I considered to be a lazy copout for a philosopher, as the point of a philosopher is to test the limits of our understanding.

Then again, for friar to state that the end solution is not god for their thinkings, at that time and place, would've probably result in being positioned as a centerpiece of a bonfire.