this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
145 points (96.8% liked)

Programming

17326 readers
206 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 79 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If one single line of code can make you lose $60M, surely you'll ensure due review processes and independent QA and clear requirements and regular audits and a middle management not only doing KPI monitoring for a failing upper management. Right? Rrrright?

[–] [email protected] 42 points 11 months ago (2 children)

AT&T made 120.74 billion in 2022. They can afford a lot of bad code.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

~~Revenue is not profit.~~

Edit: Jesus. Their profit was $70b in FY 2022?! On $120b in revenue? Maybe I’m the one misunderstanding.

[–] gravitas_deficiency 23 points 11 months ago

With a +/-0.1% margin of error, the difference between $60M and $70B is $70B.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

Do you think their profits will be dented by a $60 million loss?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

“60,000 people lost full phone service, half of AT&T's network was down, and 500 airline flights were delayed”

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure AT&T care about that due to their humanitarian nature.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

AT&T is not humanitarian non-profit company. It should worry about increasing its profits by providing people with good product so that people choose them over competition.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That hasn't seemed to be their overall strategy considering how shitty their service is.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I personally had better experience with them than Verizon. But whatever. The fact that they have customers today does meant that they provide competitive service. Today, you can easily switch provider.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

AT&T does a lot more than provide phone service.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I can ask the same about your post. My point is that you can change it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Which would matter if that was AT&T's only source of revenue. Now tell me how you can change ISPs from AT&T easily. Especially in a smaller city or town.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Natural monopoly and anti-competitive behavior would like to have a little chat with you in that dark alley over there...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Yes, anti-monopoly laws are important to provide competitive market.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Hahahaha, you're kidding right? I shit you not, I've literally seen a single line change almost cost a company £150MM during testing because "we need to test in prod because the guy we need to run the test hasn't got access to the QA environment"

Best part was the actual change, there was a bug where a number that should've been divided by 100 was being multiplied by 100, the dev somehow managed to implement the fix in such a way that the number was multiplied by a further 100.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Knight Capital Group lost $440 million in just 45 minutes due to a repurposed feature flag.

https://www.henricodolfing.com/2019/06/project-failure-case-study-knight-capital.html?m=1

Kinda makes the att one seem tiny in comparison.