this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

AMD

26 readers
1 users here now

For all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Threadripper, EPYC, rumors, reviews, news and more.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It has the same physical memory as the consumer cards, it just allows in-band ECC which is a software solution. There is no additional manufacturing cost to including in-band ECC. Nvidia even enables the option on the 4090.

You're right that you're paying for the certifications though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I thought as much, but you are still paying for it (as well as the extra bit of ram needed to make that work I assume) in that price tag

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Extra RAM would be if they used out-of-band ECC, which is where you use extra physical dies and a wider bus to handle the storage and transmission of parity data.

These use in-band ECC, which uses the existing memory chips/bus for parity. You have to toggle it in the driver, and with ECC enabled you don't get the full memory size nor the full bandwidth (you lose 1/8th of each). As far as I'm aware, no GDDR6 GPUs use out-of-band ECC.

It's purely a market segmentation thing, there is nothing physically stopping the RX7700 from running the exact same ECC mode as the W7700.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Thanks for clearing that up! My assumption was these cards would have a little extra memory so they could hit the 16GB with ECC turned on.

And yeah, it is just market segmentation but you still have to pay for it unfortunately 🤣🤣