AMD

25 readers

1 users here now

For all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Threadripper, EPYC, rumors, reviews, news and more.

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

AFMF vs Official drivers (alien.top)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Do the Nov 9th AFMF drivers contain the same improvements as the 23.11.1 drivers? Or are they a separate branch?

Currently using the Oct 17th AFMF drivers on my 6750xt. Saw that 23.11.1 has stable diffusion improvements and have wanted to give that a try. It also has support for MW3. I don't really use AFMF as my FPS is already pretty decent (saw on average around 175ish on the Zombies mode at 1440 with my settings).

So I guess basically what I am asking if AFMF is the only difference between the preview and official drivers, or if I will lose performance going from AFMF to Official.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nobody should be using the DirectML version though...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The Onnx system is just a hacked way of working with SD as far as my trials with it have shown, with frequent errors and the hassle of converting models and 'will this work or not' . Directml has been very stable for me, I've honestly had enough of errors and fault finding.
I come from a tech background of writing code back to the 80's - even writing vba for excel is easier than dealing with this hassle. Just my opinion though of course.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

even writing vba for excel is easier

Yeah cause its intended for semi non programmer office workers. It has almost none of the features you need in a production quality programming language though.

DirectML is pretty much doomed because nobody is going to run that on a server.