this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
0 points (50.0% liked)

AMD

26 readers
1 users here now

For all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Threadripper, EPYC, rumors, reviews, news and more.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why? It's nothing but a 3d mark... test. Nothing real world... just... hey I got this score.. bragging right software

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cinebench uses the same rendering engine as the commercial Cinema 4D software which is used to make movies and games.

It gives a good idea of how that software will run, but also how 3D rendering software (rasterization, ray tracking, path tracing, radiosity, volumetics) in general will perform, and the workload of heavy floating-point vector instructions coupled with moderate memory load (mostly stressing the cache levels, with the large L3 per-CCX cache of Threadripper helping a lot).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The previous iterations of cinebench showed little to no scaling with memory performance of 3D v cache. Did something change with 2024?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Well matjeh already answered, but IMO it represents a real workload IF you run it on the GPU.

There's a table out that shows the 14900 and 7950X scoring around 2.2k pts, which is like 1/5th of a 4060's 10k pts. The 4090 scores just under 35k pts.

Running CB24 on this beast of a system will show up where the best CPU currently is vs the best GPU score considering the article said the A6000 Ada can score over 90% above a 4090 in certain workloads.

Source: https://www.cgdirector.com/cinebench-2024-scores/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Sometimes it's just nice to see big numbers go brrr!

Number bigger better!