this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
1011 points (93.7% liked)

tumblr

3483 readers
1345 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Every time I see this question, I have to wonder if it's genuine. Are you genuinely at a loss to come up with a standard for what's acceptable? Is this really difficult for you to imagine? Or are you just pretending to struggle, for rhetorical effect, because you secretly long to be intolerant and are trying to find a way to pooh-pooh requests for tolerance? Idk. You could just be stupid, and "intolerance means not allowing other ways of life to exist" is too difficult for you to understand.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because it always cones down to an entirely individualized arbitrary standard.

As neat as the meme is, it just abstracts the problem another level.

A level that still looks very similar to mob rule.

The thoughts and ideas that drive progress rarely start from the middle of society.

And in times of rising authoritarianism the tendency of the center mob to excise and exclude overreaches and leads to an era of fascism.

So, rhetorically, what im worried about is how the circle of tolerance always shrinks. Im worried how some use the line of tolerance as a weapon to control thoughts of others.

Is that stupid to you? Any other names you want to call me in the name of tolerance?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Because it always cones down to an entirely individualized arbitrary standard.

No, it doesn't, and pretending so will not make your case any more convincing.

As neat as the meme is, it just abstracts the problem another level.

A level that still looks very similar to mob rule.

Explain how not accepting hatred and bigotry is "mob rule" and not just "keeping peace", thanks.

The thoughts and ideas that drive progress rarely start from the middle of society.

True but irrelevant. What is your point, here?

And in times of rising authoritarianism the tendency of the center mob to excise and exclude overreaches and leads to an era of fascism.

"In times of rising authoritarianism", sure. But waves of democratic protest for popular movements is not rising authoritarianism. It's rising libertarianism, the exact opposite.

So, rhetorically, what im worried about is how the circle of tolerance always shrinks.

Such as when, and how? When do those pushing for tolerance ever "shrink their circle"? You're just making this up.

Im worried how some use the line of tolerance as a weapon to control thoughts of others.

No, you're not. If you really are, then yes, you are stupid.