this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
805 points (97.0% liked)

Games

31793 readers
861 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

As I said.

(The linked article is about Epic)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. Not having an alternative marketplace--and no other one exists--is anti-customer and yet, you seem to have no problem with a Steam monopoly. Why?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"it exists" is not enough reason to use something.

If I start an online store that charges twice as much as Steam and has none of the features are you going to purchase from it just because It'S cOmPeTiTioN tO StEaM's MoNoPoLy?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Probably not. Do games on the Epic Store cOSt TwIcE aS MucH? Do you routinely buy goods and services with irrelevant features to your needs?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So we agree that it's unreasonable to purchase from a store that provides worse service just because it exists or to "promote competition".

EPICs anti-customer practices (such as trying to make everything exclusive) are reasons for consumers not to use them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

No and it's not worse service.