I actually fact checked this and it's true.
this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
642 points (99.8% liked)
196
16593 readers
2430 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It is partly true. Polaris is in fact a triple star system. The youngest of the three stars (Polaris Aa) is indeed younger than sharks at between 45 and 67My old. It is in tight orbit with Polaris Ab which is 500My old, and Polaris B which is 1.5By old and a little bit farther away. Here’s a pic from Hubble:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Polaris_alpha_ursae_minoris.jpg
I feel cheated that the north star is in fact 3 stars.
I think it’s also worth mentioning that Polaris Aa, the youngest star in the triplet, is also the brightest by 3 orders of magnitude. Without Polaris Aa, we wouldn’t actually consider it as the North Star at all…so I think you are safe to continue using this as a fact.
Go blow some people’s minds, everyone!
Me too. It’s a sick fact. Sharks are still older than trees tho…
Happens a lot. Sometimes a "star" is actually a whole galaxy.
I want to know how three stars can form as a system at very different times. Shouldn't they have similar ages?
My understanding is that, on a cosmic scale, these timeframes are not tremendously different!