1384
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 153 points 8 months ago

I could actually cry right now, what a fucking relief

[-] [email protected] 82 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's also by a pretty decent margin so far:

With 59% reporting:

55.9% For

44.1% Against

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/11/07/us/elections/results-ohio-issue-1-abortion-rights.html

Edit:

56.6% For

43.4% against

[-] [email protected] 58 points 8 months ago

I don't live in Ohio, but I'm right on the state border. So many "vote no on issue 1" signs around here. I was worried that it would fail. Glad to see otherwise.

[-] [email protected] 65 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's been polling consistently strong. Those signs you were seeing on the border are not representative of where the majority of Ohioans live.

What people need to take away from this is that the majority very often want things that are denied to them by a minority of voters who have been given disproportionate control.

What were seeing is direct democracy in action. No gerrymandered districts, just the people voting for what they fuck they want, and majority rules.

If we had more of that (not full direct democracy 24/7 but more than we have now) you'd see a lot more popular things actually get done.

There's danger there, populism is a double edged sword, but the opposite extreme is what we have now: a majority of people consistently and perpetually having their will undermined by a minority entirely because of their zip code, while the Republicans the minority gives power to continue to make this even worse.

When you actually look at national polling, the majority of people want a lot of things that have no hope of ever making it through Congress any time in the near future because of obstruction from red states that get disproportionate power entirely because of geography. This is untenable.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Those last 2 paragraphs are the sanest thing I'm likely to read all day.

[-] zalgotext 7 points 8 months ago

My polling place is right next to a sizeable Catholic church, and the amount of "vote no on issue 1" signs I saw in front of it was almost comical

[-] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago

Drop off a donation box of wire coathangers.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

New hobby unlocked

[-] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Did some of those signs "mysteriously" break?

[-] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

That's a hell of a margin!

[-] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

I wonder if they'll even bother claiming voter fraud with that kind of margin. But you know they are just dying to do it. "We didn't lose, the other team cheated".

load more comments (6 replies)
this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
1384 points (99.4% liked)

politics

18138 readers
3703 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS