Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
It is breitbart after all.
It's breitbart after all...
The people on there are perfectly willing to have propaganda shoveled down their throats, especially if it dehumanizes some out group.
Breitbart sure fits the bill.
I am not. But either way this is just an ad hominem.
I do not support terror organizations like Hamas, Russia, or Isreal.
Yeah right! Show us the gang tattoo!
Every Hamas member has one on the top right butt cheek.
Still better than fucking Salon or Huffpo or whatever.
Sources: feels.
Except you're wrong - which I'm sure you're used to given the fact you're defending Breitbart. Not that Huffpo or Salon being worse would have any impact on how braindead and propagandistic Breitbart is.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/huffington-post
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/salon
I suppose you are nobody, and it certainly seems that you got triggered.
Congratulations - you somehow failed your way into making a correct statement. Enjoy this refreshing new experience.
Seriously, how many times? Rule 1, No r-slurs. 2 day ban.
Is it still whataboutism or a fallacy to say mbc is biased in of itself? That (in my personal experience) leftists are more prone to feeling the need to make websites like that?
It's certainty predictable. Do you have a particular concern to share, or is this a feels thing?
It depends on the context of the conversation:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
If you respond to "Breitbart is shit" with "but what about X, Y, Z", then it is. But if for example the conversation instead started with "X, Y, Z is shit", then it wouldn't.
I agree with you that MBC, salon, and huffington are bad. (I disagree that they are worse), but that isn't relevant to criticism of breitbart.
This might be a good whataboutism speed run attempt. 3 comments in isn't bad.
Yeah, I kinda deserved that.