Technology

57472 readers

3622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1681

The average car purchased in 2023 emits higher levels of carbon dioxide (CO₂) than its 2013 equivalent. This is due to the large proportion of SUVs in the mix, which tend to be bigger and heavier. (english.elpais.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

349 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 49 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)

What if instead we had Less Cars and more Public Transit?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sure! But that's not a silver bullet.

Decarbonization is a multi-prong solution and switching everything over to public transportation would take decades. It takes time to create the infrastructure and generations to change minds. Investing in public transportation, bike infrastructure and electrifying our cars are all necessary for our goal to lower green house gasses.

Perfect is the enemy of good

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It takes time to create the infrastructure and generations to change minds.

It took the Netherlands what, 20 years? There's also countless examples of cities just deciding to have better public infrastructure and then acting on it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

More than 20 years, peak car ridership occurred in the 1970s which was close to 80% of urban transportation done by car. That number is now down to 19% of all urban transportation done by car.

Amsterdam also had backing from the public to transition to bike and public transportation.

Absolutely we should invest in public transportation! And you are right that cities have decided to create public transportation, and then did! But it took a decade plus to plan, build and implant the new system. That's also ignoring the millions and billions of dollars needed.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

Id like to have more public transit than I currently have which is none.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

Please clap lemmy

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

"But there's no profit in that. Why would we do that?"

the people with all the power

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But there is profit in it. Public transit can be a revenue generator that at least pays for itself as opposed to roads that are nothing but a huge cost over its lifetime.

And then there are the second-order effects of better economic activity in the areas around metro stations, a healthier populace that is less of a burden on the healthcare system, and overall higher happiness, which makes for better workers. It's just that it can take a decade or two to see these effects come to fruition.

But politicians rarely see that far out.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's not how the calculations for streets work. National economy is pretty darn complex and streets are paying for itself in a lot of countries.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

Source: Trust me bro.

Public transit literally pays for itself, no "darn complex" calculation required.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

As a cyclist, COVID lockdown was bliss. No vehicles on the roads, just other cyclists out for their hour of exercise. It was literally mind blowing how different the roads felt.