this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
767 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

57432 readers
3957 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Most of the world's biggest advertisers have stopped buying ads on Elon Musk's X, exclusive new data shows::Musk and X CEO Linda Yaccarino have recently stated that most of the company's top-spending advertisers from last year have returned.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 37 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (7 children)

Just hypothetically, jokes and feelings aside for discussion sake, if we assume Elon had a plan after taking over (whether he did it by mistake or whatever) what do you think it could be?

[–] [email protected] 64 points 10 months ago (1 children)

To use the platform to support rightwing candidates in fachist/ hostile takeovers of democratic governments.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This would make sense. His affiliations with state governments, which he plays against each other when looking to set up somewhere, would be reinforced if he could control the conversation. Then there’s China, where he’s the one beholden to the government, and he could offer some control to help shape their international image in return for just access to cheap labour and an export market, or to the Saudis where he can always find more funds.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Saudi Arabia felt Twitter was a problem, so they paid Elon to take it down in a way it wouldn't come back.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why would they "take it down" when anyone with even a modicum of business knowledge would assume a better replacement would be created and take it's place. This making the next version of Twitter even harder to control.

Taking it over and controlling the content on it is/was the smart play, especially if you're going to fork over the $ to buy it outright.

Stop trying to justify Elon's shit business decisions. He can just be a fucking moron that got lucky with a few strategic purchases.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean, maybe a better replacement does come. But just like reddit, it takes a long time and not everyone will actually leave. Now like reddit, it's just full of BS and has fragmented the community. If the goal was to tear down a platform where people can organize while not fully killing it (preventing the immediate need for a replacement) then he's doing a good job.

Yes he could be just an idiot, but all throughout history evil men have done evil things and used their "ignorance" as an excuse. People calling you stupid is much easier to manage than people calling you evil.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

He can be stupid and evil

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

if the goal is to collapse the business they would have done it a lot faster

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think it's more than destroy the business, it's to totally delegitimize the platform and flood it with people who would ruin any legit discourse.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

ruin any legit discourse

That happened years before Elon bought it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I wonder if they made the same arrangement with him to get him to ruin electric cars - and then were surprised when people kept buying Teslas anyway.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 10 months ago

To jerk himself off about being a genius businessman.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think he was only interested in building a great big echo chamber for his own twisted ideas. Profitability is only a secondary concern.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

interested in building a great big echo chamber for his own twisted ideas.

Then he should've, y'know...built one, instead of buying one that was already built and destroying it.

Then again I've never been on Twitter, so I can just sit back and snack on the popcorn with Michael on this one.

[–] mindbleach 2 points 10 months ago

"4D chess" is almost always you, as a clever person, making up reasons a famous idiot would do something obviously dumb.

But he could hardly be more efficient at ruining the company and salting the earth. It would be impressive, if it wasn't just dumb.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago

See my thing posted like right just above this