this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
194 points (97.1% liked)

Formula 1

8926 readers
166 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but donโ€™t want to become formuladank.

Up next


F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location Date
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands 23-25 Aug
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy 30 Aug-01 Sep
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Azerbaijan 13-15 Sep
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore 20-22 Sep
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States 18-20 Oct
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico 25-27 Oct
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil 01-03 Nov
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States 21-23 Nov
๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Qatar 29 Nov-01 Dec
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช Abu Dhabi 06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Random checks seem odd to me

There's only 20 cars, just check them all

[โ€“] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Agreed, if by random check they found 2 of 4, they should do check all the grid. Jezz

[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Imagine this was some sort of safety check, and after finding 50% of your sample faulty you just stopped checking. Well done F1.

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Yea this decision has a lot of โ€œcovid cases keep climbing because they keep testingโ€ energy. If 50% fail then you need to test the whole damn field lol

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

But it's not a safety check. Its a technical rules check. They applied the rules as they are written, is this not what everyone wants? If they randomly changed the rules in order to DQ more cars, that would be an outrage. I think a lot of F1 fans need to actually think about what they they are asking for.

[โ€“] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago

Plenty of things in F1 are random checks. Weighing the cars during quali is random. The randomness is enough of a deterrent that teams do not run cars below the minimum weight. But things like plank wear should be checked for all because the teams cannot accurately know how much the plank is worn especially on sprint weekends.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Random checks are fine, but if itโ€™s something that can affect all cars then they should all be checked. So for plank wear, if 1 of the 4 fails, all 20 cars should be checked.

If the drs wing opening too far is checked and failed both of the cars from that team should be checked, as thatโ€™s unlikely to apply to the other teams.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The FIA can't check every car on the grid for every single rule in the regulations. It's not practical, and is a waste of time and money.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

No but if they have reason to suspect a large number of cars aren't in compliance then they should check, and then decide what to do. Instead of "unlucky we checked you today".