this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
15 points (89.5% liked)

College Football

875 readers
1 users here now

A community to discuss college football.

Find your team's community

Join the Fanaticus Discord

/c/CFB Poll Top 25 Fanaticus
1. Oregon Oregon
2. Texas Texas
3. Notre Dame Notre Dame
4. Penn State Penn State
5. ~~SMU~~ SMU
6. Ohio State Ohio State
7. ~~Indiana~~ Indiana
8. Georgia Georgia
9. ~~Tennessee~~ Tennessee
10. South Carolina South Carolina
11. Arizona State Arizona State
12. Boise State Boise State
13. Alabama Alabama
14. Ole Miss Mississippi
T-15. Iowa State Iowa State
T-15. Miami Miami
17. BYU BYU
18. ~~Clemson~~ Clemson
19. ~~Army~~ Army
20. Colorado Colorado
T-21. Syracuse Syracuse
T-21. UNLV UNLV
23. Louisville Louisville
24. Illinois Illinois
25. Baylor Baylor

Check out our other sports communities!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

There are rules about attending practices in person or using electronic devices to aid in sign stealing. But if you just notice your opponent using a specific sign and it correlating certain plays or schemes, that’s just part of the game. It’s a team’s responsibility to obfuscate their signs, otherwise why use signs at all? If you weren’t allowed to see what the sideline is signaling to the players, just hold the play name up on a card, then you could save time teaching kids the signals.

I’m guessing the investigation is more to make sure they didn’t use one of the outlawed methods, and I’m willing to bet they didn’t and just got pretty good at figuring out signs. Or are just good enough that teams think that’s what they’re doing.