this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
273 points (93.3% liked)

World News

39522 readers
1906 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (23 children)

You missed the key word there which was should be.

Attacking a hospital is outright terrorism imo and has no place in war. Attack a supply depot or some other strategic point but a fucking hospital? A place dedicated to treating any human being regardless of politics, status, etc. blown up.

Dogs. The lot of them. May the toll of the war bell ring loudest and the longest among them and each of their supporters.

[–] Peaty -2 points 1 year ago (22 children)

No I didn't miss it. These words mean things already. Terrorism is something non-state entities engage in. When nations do it they are called acts of war.

If a bunch of American burn down a bar in Canada that would be terrorism. If the US army did the same thing it would be a legal justification for Canada to declare war. That's because militaries are acting on behalf of the country while random citizens are not.

There's no reason for this to change unless you hold to the idea that somehow terrorism is worse than acts of war or war crimes which is pretty childish and ignorant.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Okay so you’re arguing pedantics. Let’s do it.

Can you find any official global sources that define terrorism vs an act of war?

I couldn’t but I only checked for a short while.

[–] Peaty -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What does arguing pedantics mean? Note pedantics isn't a word.

Yes the UN codes regarding war crimes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Arguing pedantics = conversational way of saying that you are being pedantic.

Define terrorism not war crimes, obviously. Nobody was arguing for the definition of war crimes, and just because something isn’t a formal war crime, doesn’t mean it’s not something else (which would possibly include but not limit to only terrorism)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You know what they meant.

You are still being pedantic arguing about semantics.

If you have to obscure your animus behind a veil of linguistics then you don't actually have one.

Is that a big enough vocab for you

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)