this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
4 points (83.3% liked)
networking
2932 readers
2 users here now
Community for discussing enterprise networks and the ensuing chaos that comes after inheriting or building one.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I had that exact same modem. I don't see any issues with not having a firewall unless you're trying to actively block outgoing connections to some domains. Incoming connections are already going nowhere by default because of the NAT: the modem gets the public IP, and unless there's a forwarding rule to send it to a local device, it acts as a defacto block all incoming firewall (unless you enable DMZ of course, or the passthrough option to use your own router).
I think it's a fairly decent modem/small router overall. Unlike some other brands, it doesn't bother with implementing a million features almost nobody uses that could cause instability. It routes, it forwards, it WiFi's, that's what 99% of the people need and want. Unlike other "try to do too much" routers I've had, this one's been rock solid and delivered the advertised speeds.
Basically, it gives you Internet without interfering with it, and you're free to add whatever you need yourself if you so desire to. But for most cases, it's fine.