this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
1079 points (98.8% liked)

> Greentext

7584 readers
2 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Space is a terrible vacuum. It's full of literally everything.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

So is my vacuum.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In that regard Space can no longer be considered to be a vacuum. Not even remotely.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The distance between stuff is so inconceivably huge that it's still a vacuum. Kind of incredible to think about.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

What are you even talking about? I can see loads of stuff right here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

True vacuum doesn't exist, it's always relative to something else, generally to common human environment.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is absurdly untrue. Space is VERY empty. The above comment is just plain wrong. CERN has the best vacuum in the world at around 1000 atoms/cc. Deep space is less than 1. Even nebulae have a density far below 1000 atoms/cc, and those are the most dense regions of space.

It may be true that we use vacuum pumps for chip manufacturing that get vacuums less dense than the exosphere, which we like to call space sometimes, but it's definitely influenced by Earth and not a good definition of a space vacuum.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's a joke, buddy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If space was a vacuum then Roger Wilco would be out of work.