Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics.
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
We were supposed to have exhausted the earths oil resources 25 years ago.
Counting these resources is very tricky. You could just ask mining companies how much resources they have, but that number tends to increase as they drill more. See JORC code for more info.
Drilling is expensive, so the company won’t drill any more than they absolutely have to in order to convince the investors. This means that outside the measured mineral resources there’s usually a lot that is only indicated or inferred. Since, the confidence in those parts tends to be very low, the companies can’t really report those numbers as proper mineral resources. However, they can confidently report the measured and proved resources, so those are the numbers you’ll usually see in the news articles.
No. We were supposed to have hit peak oil 25 years ago. That doesn't mean all the oil goes bye-bye. It means the amount extracted, per year, no longer increases. There'd still be a shitload of oil every year. Just not quite as much as the previous year.
The fact there's a finite supply guarantees this will eventually happen. It is not physically possible to endlessly increase the amount of oil extracted each year. And the oil we're seeking out, in any given year, is what's easiest to acquire. So the net energy of extracting the oil tends to go down, barring advancements in extraction technology.
This is mostly what averted the predicted peak. Offshore drilling made oceanic reserves viable. In the continental US, oil production peaked circa 1950. It went up and down for a while but has been on a straight decline since 1970. US oil production in general peaked in 1970 and similarly fell through the 80s, 90s, and 2000s. The line only shot back up because the industry made shale and tar sands a viable source.
A child would go, 'aha, we found another source, I guess we're safe forever.' But the first seventeen bajillion barrels are gone. We've already drained a massive portion of all the oil that can even theoretically be produced. In a very real sense, America is running out of oil. We're making up for it with oil substitutes, like petrochemical-saturated dirt. In practical terms, we're still making more gasoline each year. The supply will never suddenly vanish.
But there's only so much there.