this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
-12 points (26.9% liked)

conservative

1013 readers
17 users here now

A community to discuss conservative politics and views.

Rules:

  1. No racism or bigotry.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn't provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. No spam posting.

  4. Submission headline should match the article title (don't cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  5. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.

  6. No trolling.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
-12
Is there anywhere on this site you've found decent discussion across the aisle? (self.conservative)
submitted 1 year ago by No1RivenFucker to c/[email protected]
83 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Because everywhere I look, it's just the same insane lies and mental gymnastics regurgitated straight from r/politics, with all the same refusal to even acknowledge the slightest of errors in anything they believe

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I could spend a half hour getting sources for all of those and more, but I’m sure it’d be wasted effort on you.

You also conveniently worked around the most major aspect of every point to attempt to make it about something else.

Roe v Wade is very relevant. It is an anti-science position that actively harms women. That’s very clear, especially as the Republican Party is very worried about the fact that it has galvanized a large contingent of the population against them.

Endorsement of a president who is a serial sexual assulter is a policy position, and like it or not, who you endorse is a major part of how politics work. The person and their views are then reflected on you.

The court may not be right every time, but it is right this time. This is the second map that has been rejected by a different court for still being racially based and used to disenfranchise black voters.

Florida absolutely is trying to ban gender-affirming surgery for adults. They just do it in roundabout ways like requiring a form that has not (and likely will not) be created. https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4050524-trans-adults-scramble-for-care-under-new-florida-law/amp/

Obergefell was a sound case and there’s no need to revisit it unless the goal is removing legal protections for gay marriage.