this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
1478 points (98.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

5324 readers
4167 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think that's the craziest thing. Significant numbers of people were calling them out on their lies while they were saying them and they still managed to get massive amounts of support to invade Iraq.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's because Saddam did have as chemical weapons program, it just wasn't advanced as the US/UK governments wanted to believe it was...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'd have to double check, but I'm pretty sure everything they found was just old stock they already knew about that hadn't been safely disposed of yet.The US finally got rid of the last of it's chemical weapons stock.

They made a big deal about high grade aluminum cylinders they found because they could have been used for uranium enrichment, but they were really just intended for components in regular missiles. The guy who ordered them got needlessly high quality aluminum basically because when you live in a dictatorship failure could end in your execution.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

David Kelly, the UK weapons inspector, who lead dozens of UN teams to Iraq and inspected facilities and sites first hand said Saddam was committed to developing chemical and nuclear weapons. That's the guy who's been there under the UN banner, the guy judged trustworthy to lead an international team. And that was partly based on what they found, partly on how Saddam had excavated previous weapon decommissioning sites to recover parts, and partly because Saddam and his team would repeatedly lie at every turn. Kelly regarded all of the "ready to launch in 45 mins" as made up bullshit, and he repeatedly contradicted the UK and US governments when they tried to make the threat sound more immediate. So despite calling out all the politics bullshit, Kelly was still a supporter of regime change because it was - speaking as someone who'd dealt with Saddam repeatedly - the only way to stop a man who'd used chemical weapons before using them again...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Got any book recommendations or anything? I'd love to read more.