this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
760 points (86.5% liked)

memes

10440 readers
3327 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Things have gotten better and progress has been made from times past, it just seems worse now because we have more access to information. We've come far, and have further to go!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Also, significantly less dead babies increasing average lifespan is a very happy way to boost that number

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I think we can all agree to that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

*significantly less dead baby

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The less/fewer distinction is arbitrary Victorian bullshit flying directly in the face of how English is used. The only point of it was to try and make English more like Latin and allow aristocrats who spoke Latin to look down on those without expensive private education.

Please dont perpetuate it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's no need to make shit up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I do beg your pardon, it was Georgian not Victorian era when this nonsense was dreamed up for no reason other than preference for trying to cram Latin-esque cases into english.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/no-genuine-rule-dictates-the-use-of-less-or-fewer-cs25kv8s5

The very notion of a neat distinction between fewer and less according to whether the noun is countable or not is a myth. It was invented out of whole cloth by an ill- informed 18th-century pedant called Robert Baker in his book Reflections on the English Language (1770). He proposed this distinction not as a hard-and-fast rule of grammar, moreover, but as a tentative suggestion with caveats (“I should think . . . it appears to me . . . ”) that you won’t find in modern style guides.

The wiki article on it notes that

The Cambridge Guide to English Usage notes that the "pressure to substitute fewer for less seems to have developed out of all proportion to the ambiguity it may provide in noun phrases like less promising results". It describes conformance with this pressure as a shibboleth and the choice "between the more formal fewer and the more spontaneous less" as a stylistic choice.

i.e. it is a shibboleth for saying "I am educated unlike you uncultured lot who use natural sounding language"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, people who learn and understand language are the worst

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You cant say "the worst" when talking about an uncountable group, you have to say "the least good" because I prefer that and it makes me sound smart by correcting you. Apparently that is sufficient for it to be understanding language and for you to be wrong.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most people thank me for the little correction and just go about their day without being a total asshole.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Really most people thank you for being an annoying pedant who isnt even correct?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

No, most people aren't self-important assholes like you who lie for attention.