Technology

34780 readers

275 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

171

Google accused of directing motorist to drive off collapsed bridge (www.bbc.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

84 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Philip Paxson's family are suing the company over his death, alleging that Google negligently failed to show the bridge had fallen nine years earlier.

Mr Paxson died in September 2022 after attempting to drive over the damaged bridge in Hickory, North Carolina.

A spokesperson for Google said the company was reviewing the allegations.

The case was filed in civil court in Wake County on Tuesday.

Mr Paxson, a father of two, was driving home from his daughter's ninth birthday party at a friend's house and was in an unfamiliar neighbourhood at the time of his death, according to the family's lawsuit.

His wife had driven his two daughters home earlier, and he stayed behind to help clean up.

"Unfamiliar with local roads, he relied on Google Maps, expecting it would safely direct him home to his wife and daughters," lawyers for the family said in a statement announcing the lawsuit.

"Tragically, as he drove cautiously in the darkness and rain, he unsuspectingly followed Google's outdated directions to what his family later learned for nearly a decade was called the 'Bridge to Nowhere,' crashing into Snow Creek, where he drowned."

Local residents had repeatedly contacted Google to have them change their online maps after the bridge collapsed in 2013, the suit claims.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So how the hell do they blame google instead of the local government for failing to keep up the signs and blockades?

It's such an idiotic case, "the guy drove blindly off a bridge because his navigation told him to". So in the old days, he would've had a paper map and would have driven off the bridge the same way.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Multiple entities can hold responsibility, including:

The lawsuit is also suing three local companies, arguing they had a duty to maintain the bridge.

This was a long running problem that Google was contacted to fix and didn't. They don't bear sole responsibility, but that is negligence that contributed to his death.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is not on Google and in any way, shape or form. Google Maps is not a civil engineering project. Google is not a state or local governing entity.

What's next? Google gets sued because someone missed out on an important interview? "Google Maps mislead me and caused me to lose out on a prospective job offer."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I don’t think we know that yet, and I think the discovery will be interesting.

How many reports were there? Were they credible? What other sources of truth did Google consult in deciding to ignore those reports?

Google gets lots of reports and needs to filter out spam, and especially malicious reports like trying to mark a competitor’s business as closed, or trying to get less traffic in your neighborhood for selfish reasons. It wouldn’t be reasonable for Google to accept every user suggestion either.

So if Google reached out to the town and the town said the bridge is fine, then it’s not Google’s fault. If they ignored multiple credible complaints because the area was too rural to care about, that might be negligent.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

the fault is shared. google was mentioned moreso because its big company and that makes a headline

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know whether you didn't read the article or are just one of these simpletons incapable of holding an opinion more nuanced that "good or evil", but they are suing the owners.

So in the old days, he would've had a paper map and would have driven off the bridge the same way.

Paper maps don't talk to you and tell you which way to go, do they?

I seriously can't decide whether you're some Google shill or you've just given your brain the day off.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Nice b8 m8 not going to respond to a weak troll :)