Godot

5922 readers

187 users here now

Welcome to the programming.dev Godot community!

This is a place where you can discuss about anything relating to the Godot game engine. Feel free to ask questions, post tutorials, show off your godot game, etc.

Make sure to follow the Godot CoC while chatting

We have a matrix room that can be used for chatting with other members of the community here

Other Communities

Rules

Posts need to be in english
Posts with explicit content must be tagged with nsfw
We do not condone harassment inside the community as well as trolling or equivalent behaviour
Do not post illegal materials or post things encouraging actions such as pirating games

We have a four strike system in this community where you get warned the first time you break a rule, then given a week ban, then given a year ban, then a permanent ban. Certain actions may bypass this and go straight to permanent ban if severe enough and done with malicious intent

Wormhole

[email protected]

Credits

The icon is a modified version of the official godot engine logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)
The banner is from Godot Design

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Godot: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (blog.odorchaidhe.games)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

this seems a well-argued article to me the 'General directionless development' seems the most concerning point, I don't think the 'let's go with what the community ask\want' model is gonna work in the end.

what do you think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The author is literally saying, oh I can fix all of these issues, but I don’t know what other issue might come up.

That's very often a reasonable thing to say.

The problem here is that Godot is the one that is up-front with its limitations, while the others are always trying to hide them. So yeah, this becomes smearing on this context. And completely false.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yes! It very often is a reasonable thing to say! In the sense that if you fix one bug, you might be creating a couple more bugs. Like opening a can of worms. But the author in this case used this as a retort to the community saying "if you have an issue with the engine, and you can fix it, then please contribute the fix to the github repo". So ultimately, the argument seems to be why would one contribute fixes to the engine when one might have to fix another issue afterwards. This is antithetical to the nature of FOSS and immediately discredited the author, in my mind, as having a technical discussion in good faith. I'd love to give quotes that brought me to this conclusion, but the article seems to have been taken down as I write this.

They are better served using Unreal Engine and there's nothing wrong with that.

Godot

Links

Other Communities

Rules

Wormhole

Credits