990
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

Not copyright, trademark. At least, that's the rules those comments assume Disney is following. It's pretty dumb, I can't think of any world those characters get genericised, but eh.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Disney is largely protecting its characters with trademark law now, yes. That's why there's no particular effort to extend copyright any further than they have.

Now, as long as there are companies in a capitalist system, or even in something closer to market socialism, trademark makes a certain amount of sense. You have certain branding that's associated with your company (even if it's a worker-owned co-op), and you don't want your customers confused over its use by another company. We can certainly think of ways the current system can be approved--wider protection for satire, or easier ways to shut down bullshit lawsuits without spending a lot of money--but the idea makes sense in this context.

Now, if we're aiming for a more commune-based system beyond market socialism, then no, we don't need trademark at all.

this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
990 points (97.5% liked)

internet funeral

6591 readers
400 users here now

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤart of the internet

What is this place?

[email protected] with text and titles

• post obscure and surreal art with text

• nothing memetic, nothing boring

• unique textural art images

• Post only images or gifs (except for meta posts)

Guidlines

• no video posts are allowed

• No memes. Not even surreal ones. Post your memes on [email protected] instead

• If your submission can be posted to [email protected] (I.e. no text images), It should be posted there instead

This is a curated magazine. Post anything and everything. It will either stay up or be lost into the void.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS